AtScale and AWS Show How Git-Managed Data Models Can Ground AI Agents
AtScale and AWS Show How Git-Managed Data Models Can Ground AI Agents
AI Agents & Automation

AtScale and AWS Show How Git-Managed Data Models Can Ground AI Agents

AWS Machine LearningOct 20, 2026

AtScale and AWS detailed a Redshift-based customer analytics example where an agent queries versioned business definitions with identity-aware controls.

In a technical post dated October 20, 2026, AWS and AtScale described a customer analytics workflow that pairs AtScale’s semantic layer with an agent hosted on Amazon Bedrock AgentCore. The example uses a Strands agent and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 on Amazon Bedrock to answer questions against customer data modeled in Amazon Redshift.

AtScale’s model is authored in Semantic Modeling Language, an open YAML-based specification that can be versioned in Git. The same deployed model is exposed through SQL, XMLA and the Model Context Protocol (MCP), allowing an agent and business intelligence tools to use shared definitions. The example includes measures such as revenue, order count and units sold, plus calculated measures including customer lifetime value. Teams can revise a definition in the model and review the change through a Git-based workflow.

The walkthrough keeps analytical customer, purchase and product data in Redshift. Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL remains the operational system of record, with AWS Database Migration Service or Aurora zero-ETL to Redshift described as ways to keep the analytical copy current. AtScale plans dimensional queries as native warehouse SQL. Its aggregate manager can also route matching queries to a pre-built summary table rather than scanning the purchase fact table.

The agent is instructed to list available models, load the chosen model’s dimensions and measures, and then query using those definitions. The authors tested questions including top products by units sold and high-spending customers without rewards enrollment. They also compared results with an Excel PivotTable using the same model and reported matching totals for equivalent questions.

Access follows the caller’s identity. In the post’s example, an HR user’s model perspective includes Social Security number data, while a marketing user’s perspective does not expose that field. The reference deployment places AtScale on Amazon EKS and connects its MCP server to AgentCore Gateway. AWS presents this as an implementation guide in a series of semantic-layer examples, rather than as a new product launch.

Industry Impact

Shared business definitions for AI analytics

Customer analytics, business intelligence, enterprise data

Overview

The example shows how organizations can let AI agents query warehouse data through the same governed business definitions used by BI tools. Data and software teams can version model changes in Git, while identity-aware perspectives limit which fields different users can access. For executives, the approach offers a way to test agent-led analytics without replacing Redshift or existing reporting workflows. The post is an implementation guide, not evidence of a product launch or broad customer adoption.

Key Impact Points

A shared semantic model gives agents and BI tools consistent measures, reducing the risk of conflicting definitions.

Git-based review makes changes to business logic traceable and easier for teams to govern.

Identity-aware model perspectives can restrict sensitive fields according to the caller.

Opportunities

Governed agent-based analytics

Enterprise analytics, business intelligence, data platforms

Organizations with Redshift-based analytics can assess whether a semantic layer would let agents answer business questions using approved measures rather than ad hoc definitions. Data platform teams could adapt the demonstrated workflow, connect operational data to the warehouse, and use Git review to manage model changes. Identity-aware perspectives may help expose analytics to different teams without making every field available to every user. The article supports an implementation opportunity, but does not establish a new commercial offering or quantify financial returns. Any revenue potential would depend on how a provider packages and sells implementation or ongoing platform services.

  • Shared semantic models for analytics agents

    Problem: Agents and BI users can produce inconsistent answers when business measures lack shared definitions.

    Solution: Use a versioned semantic model exposed to both an agent and BI tools, with identity-aware access to model fields.

    Target Users: Data platform teams, analytics leaders, and organizations using Redshift for customer analytics.

    Business Value: Supports consistent metric definitions, reviewable model changes, and access tailored to user identity.

    Revenue Potential: The article describes no pricing or revenue model; potential is limited to implementation and platform services around deploying and maintaining the workflow.

Reference link

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/machine-learning/build-a-semantic-layer-for-agentic-ai-on-aws-with-atscale-and-amazon-bedrock-agentcore

Image Source Link

https://prod-assets.cosmic.aws.dev/a/3Fsywfb765dH2w0qzAWlox8kr5k/veri.webp

Community Discussion (0)

Loading discussions...